CASE EXAMPLE
Parent A has a net income of $3,000 per month, and Parent B with a net income of $6,000 per month, for a net family income of $9,000 per month. If they had two children, the chart would say that the expected cost of raising those children is $767 per month per child, or a total of $1,534 per month. Parent A has 1/3 (approx. 33%) of the net family income, and Parent B has 2/3 (approx. 67%). Therefore, Parent A would be responsible for about $511 of the $1,534, and Parent B would be responsible for about $1,023.
Your Seattle child support attorney will use the full-time income of both parents to determine your family’s net income. If one parent does not have a full-time income, but is capable of earning a full-time income, then normally the state will impute a full-time income to that person. Of course there can be arguments as to what income that parent is capable of earning.
If one child lived with Parent A primarily and the other child primarily lived with Parent B, split custody calculations may be used by their Seattle child support attorney to offset the respective obligations between the parents. Other reasons for deviation can include:
- Unusual wealth
- Tax planning
- Children from other relationships
- Significant amount of time spent with the other parent (especially if there is a 50/50 parenting plan)
This can be thoroughly addressed by a Seattle family attorney. However, one example is that, to avoid people being able to artificially lower their income through income deferral, voluntary retirement contributions are capped at $5,000 per year. You can still contribute more, you just won’t get credit in the child support calculation.
CASE EXAMPLE (cont.)
If Parent A, from our previous example, is the primary residential parent, then Parent B would be paying $1,023 per month to Parent A, to make sure that Parent A has $1,534 available to meet the various expenses for the child.